JUNE 2016 Treatment for Application
Timber treatment, timber durability and the life of timber in various applications is a complex topic to deal with. To fully explain it would take a lot longer than this factsheet. Previous factsheets have dealt with specific items such as moisture affects, basic durability, and flood prone areas. Here I will try to give you some understanding of treatment with wood preservatives and levels that may be required in different situations. The intended end use and conditions can play a big part in determining the level of durability. Climate and Fundamental issues relating to treatment for various applications include:
- If timber is physically protected from weather and termites the life expectancy should not be a concern. It is the action of moisture, termites and insects that cause degradation.
- All timber has a natural durability depending on the species. The natural durability is on a scale from Class 1 Highly Durable (eg. Ironbark) to Class 4 Non-durable (eg. Radiata Pine). As an example the life expectancy for above ground exposure is 40+ years for Class 1 and <7 years for Class 4 timber. TPAA Tech Note #5
- The non-durable sapwood of most species can be treated with preservative chemicals to relevant Hazard Class levels to increase durability. The Hazard Classes range from H1 (Inside above ground) to H6 (Marine Waters). TPAA Tech Note #2
- The intended end use and conditions can play a big part in determining the level of durability. Climate and detailing must also be factored into the equation. It is about assessing the effects of moisture, termites & insects.
Matching natural durability to the Hazard Class can be confusing as Durability Class 1 is for the most durable timber but the Hazard Class is H6 for the highest hazard. This may be simplified by thinking in either situation the higher the number the greater the biological threat. By understanding of the nature and frequency of the threat, you can specify the timber species and treatment required to suit the application. Let’s go through some examples which may help clarify the thought process:
- We will start off with simple examples which relate to Hazard Classes. For non-durable timbers H2 preservative treatment protects against termites, H3 against above ground weather exposed, H4 against in ground exposure, H5 critical in-ground and fresh water application and H6 for salt water. The heartwood of durable timbers must be matched to the application. This is the basic premise and from here we can look at a combination of environment, use, durability and treatment in the next examples.
- LVL Scaffold planks and Formwork beams have gained popularity over the past 20 years and are now used extensively. These are manufactured from pine, typically Radiata Pine which is Durability Class 4. On top of this they are not preservative treated in any way. Despite being the least durable material with no preservative treatment this product in the application is durable. The timber as used on a construction site is normally kept well ventilated. It does get wet with rain but then dries out quickly so fungal decay due to moisture is not common. Termites and other organisms are also not common on construction sites. This assessment of the hazards has led to a lower cost product that still meets user expectations.
- As an opposite scenario, consider a deck in a rainforest area with high humidity and minimal sunshine. According to the hazard class this only requires H3 treatment for the non-durable sapwood matched with appropriately durable heartwood. Looking at the application for the deck joists they will most likely stay damp for considerable periods of time and there are also moisture traps present between the joists and decking. This is where an astute specifier could decide that H3 treatment may not be suitable for long term durability and that H4 treatment of the sapwood is required along with higher durability heartwood.
- Timber in flood prone areas is another item which is commonly misunderstood. This is timber which is likely to get inundated infrequently for short periods of time. Many specifiers ask for either flood resistant timber (not sure what the actual definition of this is!) or revert to H3 preservative treatment. As seen in example 1 above, provided it does not get wet during normal use, flooded timber, as long as it is allowed to dry out following a flood event does not require any preservative treatment, even for non-durable timber species.
This factsheet has only touched the surface. There are a number of other guides which look at specific situations. One of the most informative is the Wood Solutions Guide #5 on Timber service life design. This is available from www.woodsolutions.com.au and looks at predicted life of timber taking into account all the factors above. The Timber Preservers Association of Australia (TPAA) also has a number of relevant publications which can be located at www.tpaa.com.au. If specifying any timbers which are subject to possible degradation it is important that you consider all of the above aspects in deciding both which timber you use and then what level of treatment, if any, is applied.